Time to pause and reflect on the life and good works of Ladybird Johnson, as reported so very well by the Washington Post in the past week.  First up is fashion writer Robin Givhan:

She had an appreciation for beauty and its potential to instill pride in people, to comfort them and to bring them joy.  Her focus was not on the rarefied world of museums and symphonies, but beauty in a far more democratic form: nature.

With her death Wednesday at 94, much has been said about her dogged determination to see tulips and daffodils brighten the Washington landscape and to coax wildflowers to bloom along the country’s highways.  Notice that she was entranced by wildflowers, not painstakingly cultivated antique roses or finicky orchids.  She marveled at the kinds of flowers that often fade into the background.

Givhan went on to take a stand herself, urging the fashion industry to strive for pretty clothes that can be worn by any woman, not just Cameron Diaz.  Great idea.  Never happen.

And I love this tidbit about how Ladybird, who had the misfortune to follow Jackie Kennedy as First Lady, adjusted to the public eye, “She trimmed down to a size 10, learned to use flattering make-up, but never managed to keep her stockings from sagging at the ankles.”  I knew I liked her.

Next, from an appreciation by Ann Gerhart:

She hated the word beautification. It sounded sissified, she always said. She focused on the health and pathology of the world we inhabit.  After riots erupted, she planted daffodils. Yet she carried out her vision not through garden-club fluttering but through a flurry of legislation.”

Garden club fluttering?  Speaking as a former garden club president, that hurts.  But does it reflect a bias against this traditionally female social institution or are garden clubs really still just fluttering (and judging silly displays of single flowers in glass jars?  There you see my own bias.)

Garden writer Adrian Higgins also writes that Mrs. Johnson hated the word beautification because it trivializes what she was trying to do. 

She helped organize the facelift of much of Washington’s civic spaces through mass plantings of spring bulbs and flowering trees and shrubs; vestiges of that floral blitzkrieg linger even as other major U.S. cities today have far outpaced Washington in their commitment to greening. 

So, I finally see in print the assertion that our capital city is lagging behind other major U.S. cities in going green.  I immediately fired off a message to DC’s enviro Yahoo group:  “DC Not Green?” asking if people agree and if so, what can be done?  Just asking.

Higgins also mentioned that the Ladybird Johnson Wildflower Center in Texas is working with the American Society of Landscape Architects and the U.S. Botanic Garden “to develop standards and guidelines for certifying sustainable green landscapes in the same way that buildings now are certified by the U.S. Green Building Council.”  The program’s aimed at large landscape projects  like public parks, highway plantings, and office parks; see Sustainable Sites for more details.  Judging from how quickly the Green Building Council’s LEED ratings for environmental sensitivity are becoming de rigeur for developers, similar standards for landscaping could have a huge impact.  We’ll stay tuned. 

But there’s more big news from the Wildflower Center.  They’re working to develop a web-based carbon footprint calculator to help in designing environmentally sustainable landscapes.  But get this: Higgins quotes a Wildflower Center staffer saying, “We are finding that in many cases [meadow] grasses may be more effective in sequestering carbon than forests.”  So, like the arguments now rampant in the food industry over distances traveled, hothouses and oil-based fertilizers, it looks like the landscaping world faces some food fights of our own between competing interest groups. 

Finally, an article about Mrs. Johnson’s impact on D.C. included lists of parks and schools she had a hand in improving and made this important point:

In Johnson’s view, what she was trying to do was much more significant than merely making things look nice.  Beautification had to do with combating pollution, halting urban decay, providing recreational opportunities, attending to citizens’ mental health needs, developing public transportation and addressing the rising crime rate.“

Someone from the nonprofit group Washington Parks & People is quoted:

When she talked about beautification and the environment, she was talking about forgotten natural places and forgotten people.  She connected the two.  She really was the person who founded the urban environmental movement.

Was Mrs. Johnson’s role as an environmental pioneer – right up there with Rachel Carson – widely known before this week?  No matter.  Her legacy is now clear.

From these stories we start to see the impact this steel magnolia had on the Washington, D.C. area.  For stories of her good works in Texas, we’ll have to ask our Austin readers.