The title of this post tells you it won’t be a happy one. It might even make you angry. I wrote it just for blog readers – gardeners! Not to rally locals to take sides. I’ve waited a few weeks to calm down and get some perspective, but I’m not totally there yet and I hope that sharing the story will help. 

The background

As last reported in this post I worked for over 2 years to clear the jungle that a prominent city garden had become. It’s shown above in the condition it was when I got to work – not terrible from this view, but lots of blank spaces close to the sidewalk.

But these other views of the garden reveal the invasive vines and other nuisance plants that got my attention (though clearly not the attention of the city’s landscape crew). I couldn’t resist taking on the job of clearing the English ivy from trees – it’s SO gratifying!

The garden is dominated by over 50 old oakleaf hydrangeas, all of which miraculously survived our worst droughts (so far), despite the lack of irrigation or supplemental watering of any kind. The sight of them in this condition is cringe-worthy, but I sure couldn’t carry enough water to make a difference. 

Packera aurea donated by the garden club – just planted, and as they appear blooming in my garden. They bloomed their very first spring.

With most of the vines and other weeds gone, I and other volunteers planted Packera aurea donated by the local garden club – planted with the permission of the city staffer in charge.   

Recent destruction and dismissal

Since our planting day last fall, the new plants survived our bad winter and were just starting to bloom when one morning I found them all gone! Also gone were the volunteer redbuds I’d grouped into a small grove. 

So what happened? Long, awful story short, the person who gave us permission was gone and the landscape crew, believing the new plants to be weeds, removed them all (despite the blooms).

Well, we reported it and after several months we have the outcome – which is NOT that the club is being reimbursed for the plants, or that the mistake is forgiven because now we’re collaborating with the landscape crew to make this important garden even better. 

Nope! We were told by email that we had permission to keep removing invasives but that “Moving forward, new plantings will be the horticulture crew’s responsibility.”  

Maybe I too emotionally invested

This is a garden I’d checked on almost daily, imagining improvements like using hosta and Solomon’s seal divisions to fill in the empty spaces – at no cost, just volunteer labor. And adding some donated black-eyed Susans (our state flower) for long-lasting summer color.

But my reaction to that (imho, disrespectful) email has surprised me. I was SO hurt and angry I told the others to respond because I needed to step back from volunteering for the city, for my peace of mind.

I even stopped walking by the garden! I dread seeing the remaining bits of grape vine (that grows a foot a day, or seems to) smothering the hydrangeas again, and covering the old viburnum I’ve been lovingly renewal-pruning, a years-long process. I’m not sure I’m a big enough person to continue that work now.

So I’m wondering how to care less? I’d lost a garden before (by moving away after 26 years), but this loss comes with a complicated mix of hurt and anger. 

What’s in store for that garden now?

The black-eyed susans we offered for the site were rejected with no explanation, except that they would be appropriate in the large (and largely unmanaged) pollinator garden in a city park.

So with the Packera aurea destroyed and the black-eyed susans rejected, what plants DID the city have in mind for this very prominent garden? A quick look at what they’re planting in other city gardens gives us a big clue. Sorry if these examples hurt your eyes. They do mine. And I didn’t even show you the photos with irrigation tubing as the most prominent feature.

Mid-summer in the city’s gardens.

So I’m wondering if the horticulture crew’s preference for outdated plants and design styles is behind their refusal of volunteer help, donated plants and garden-club expertise. Surely they’ve heard criticism.   

I found some older photos of the garden from when its irrigation system was functioning and the crew planted annuals there. We’re told they intend to “increase horticultural activity” there, so we can expect to see the return of these pitiful annuals. We would have filled in the blank spaces with perennials, mostly divisions from on-site.

How to improve city plantings?

I’ve long hoped to see change come to our outdated, high-maintenance, wasteful public gardens. Does anyone have examples of civic gardens that would save the city money on plants, water and labor? I suspect that arguments over design or even environmental concerns might not carry the day, but cost savings might. Help! 

Does it make sense to keep buying annuals every year that need this amount of fussing over? And resources? I see this water truck and crew frequently, about a block from my house, keeping a few annuals alive.