
Back in our innocent pre-ChatGBT days, we were excited about how emerging technologies could help gardeners. We were on the watch for new phone apps that could help with identification of weeds, design, watering systems and more.
Those days are over. Now many gardeners simply assume that their phones have the answers to most gardening questions and problems.
First, let it be said that there are a lot of great apps out there. There are also a lot of really bad ones. The problem is that many people just grab any old app, without bothering to research first. Plant ID apps really have been tested, as Susan reported about a year and a half ago. But too many simply don’t look at that information and use the first one they find, with iffy results.
The same thing is happening with mail order, though we can’t blame a bad app for that. The research step is being skipped and the results to a google query are chosen by the sole criterion of lowest price. There really are bad mail order houses and don’t get me started on Etsy and eBay, where seeds for bright red and blue hostas are among some of the more flagrant offerings.
Mail order houses for plants – especially houseplants – have been investigated and rated. I am a big fan of New York Times Wirecutter, which is like a much cooler Consumer Reports and very, very thorough. They did houseplants recently.
For outdoor plants, Garden Watchdog on Dave’s Garden is still around and seems up to date.
There are also apps that claim to diagnose and recommend treatment for plant problems, from photos. I only know these exist because a few gardeners in my area seem to be using them. One person posted pictures of 4 different plants with obvious frost damage and said her app diagnosed this as fungus (the same fungus for 4 different species) and advised treatment with baking soda. (Of course, as we all know, baking soda, vinegar and Dawn dish soap are the three powerhouses of gardening supremacy. According to their acolytes, any problem can be overcome if you’re armed with these.)
Whatever app was used analyzed pictures without context. It should come as no surprise that May saw more than a few hard frosts and even a sprinkling of snow in Western New York. We’re used to it. I fix it by simply removing the damaged foliage if it’s too terrible looking, though my standards are pretty lax. But that’s really all you can do.
Apps don’t know this about Western New York. Maybe someday they will – in fact, I’m sure of it. But if it means discarding all our hard-won gardening knowledge, our powers of observation and our familiarity with our local microclimates, I am not at all eager for that day.
(No pictures of bad gardening apps, just a scene from my May garden.)
Off topic, but that is a lovely tulip.
Do you know the variety?
Thanks, Chris
That is Insulinde. I got it from Old House Gardens, a highly rated mail order house. It’s on Garden Watchdog’s top 30 (see how I made this on topic?).
I frequently and intentionally test the limits of Gardening AI. If I google search info about plants, I always check the source material. It is astounding how often the source cited does not support the AI generated information. Most people won’t bother, however.
With plant i.d. apps, I find a couple pretty accurate most of the time, but recently my two favorites both got a variegated Kalimeris wrong and didn’t even have it down the list of options. Then a Google picture matching search led me to the correct answer, although it was pretty far down the page.
As Shakespeare said, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Knowledge of the existence of an app is no knowledge at all. Relying on these apps without knowing something about keying out plants in more detail can prove very misleading. However, finding a result, any result, on app leads to folks swearing to the i.d. thereafter! A neighbor insisted a plant i.d. search (which one is unknown) yielded a desirable (to her) native ground cover. Only she couldn’t have been more wrong. And she wasn’t about to take my word for it despite knowing my level of experience in gardening. Oh well, the weed field next door will keep me busy for years . . . .
A little learning is a dangerous thing;
drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring:
there shallow draughts intoxicate the brain,
and drinking largely sobers us again.
From Alexander Pope, An Essay on Criticism, 1709
Ugh! That sounds exasperating!
Would really be good to know of a good ID app. I hope you will keep us posted when you find one!
Follow the link I gave to Susan’s post.
I have found Picture This to be accurate approximately 85% of the time. Take a picture from different angles to get a decent idea.
Plant ID apps can be helpful, taken with a grain of salt, but AI garden design is an absolutely horrid development.
I am dismayed by the pictures of “gardens” which are AI-enhanced. So unrealistic and a recipe for disappointment 🙁
I would love to see what horrors would appear if someone asked AI to redesign Sissinghurst or Giverny.
Nothing beats having a knowledgeable friend that works in a botanical garden for accuracy. 😉
There is great fun to be had with free chatgpt. Take some photos of a problem area. Tell it with great detail what the site is like, zone, sun exposure, say things like you want winter interest, your style of garden, anything you can add. Ask it something like: generate an image: design a mixed shrub/perennial border under these sunroom windows. You upload your pics and wait 40 seconds. You have one or two free edits. I’ve done this twice and both times it gave me one good idea amidst the silly ones. I gave it a list of specific plants, said I had some stumps and asked it to make a naturalistic border. It added a boulder. Why didn’t I think of that?.