
Nandina ‘Burgundy Wine’ along the front of my house – in January. Other evergreens are Osmanthus ‘Goshiki’ and Carex ‘Ice Dance’.
I recently welcomed visitors to my townhouse garden, happily at first, until I was asked – more than once – to defend the Nandinas shrubs I’d planted along the foundation. The visitors had heard or read something about cedar waxwings being fatally poisoned by Nandina berries.
Here’s a closer view of the accused Nandinas, with gorgeous winter color when my garden is at its worst, but NO BERRIES. Yet to my accusers, cultivar/schmultivar, berries or no berries, the homeowner (me) has to answer for herself!
So in my defense (and you all know what fun it is to have to defend yourself) I turned to the most knowledgeable people I could find online, starting with the Garden Professors Facebook group. There Don Shor summarized the (apparently) sole report of such a poisoning: of cedar waxwings in Georgia found dead in 2009, five of them with their bellies full of Nandina berries, which contain cyanide and can indeed be fatal if enough are consumed. Audubon Societies and other groups were quick to tell us to remove it from our yards, or at least remove the berries.
Shor presents the facts he’s uncovered:
“Other birds don’t eat as much or as rapidly as cedar waxwings,” said Rhiannon Crain, project leader for the Habitat Network with The Nature Conservancy and Cornell Lab of Ornithology…Cedar waxwings completely stuff every possible part of their body with berries. They will fill their stomach and their crop with berries right up into their mouth until they can’t fit another berry inside of them.”It isn’t just Nandina berries. Consider the following other incidents with cedar waxwings: South Dakota: killed by eating Cotoneaster flowers; in Nebraska, killed by eating crabapples and cotoneasters; in Indiana: ethanol poisoning from overwintered hawthorn fruit; Texas, killed by gorging on blueberries along a highway.“They’re cedar waxwings,” said Capt. Garry Collins of Texas Parks & Wildlife, rather nonchalantly. “It’s a natural phenomenon. “It’s seasonal. Happens nearly every year.”
The bottom line: Where there are dense stands of Nandina, late-season berries in some areas might be the sole food source at that time for cedar waxwings. Their feeding habits can lead to mortality events in those regions. But where Nandina is not invasive and is part of a mix of food sources, cedar waxwing mortality is unlikely. If you’re really worried about it, the berries can be cut off, and fruitless varieties are available. The amount of cyanide in Nandina berries is very low, not a risk to you or your family or pets.
Garden Professor ringleader Linda Chalker-Scott had this to say:
I would imagine this is a very rare problem. In the sole report, the only thing the birds had eaten were Nandina berries. I can’t imagine many landscapes that would have only nandina berries available for frugivorous birds. In any case, it makes a good argument for diversifying one’s landscape plantings.
And one of my gardening gurus from decades ago – Ann Lovejoy – wrote “Don’t be afraid of a good shrub” for a paper in Washington State, concluding that “On the basis of this single — if well-documented — report, Heavenly Bamboo is getting a bad rap.”
Ironically, until that fatal day in 2009, nandinas were widely touted as excellent bird food. Those poor cedar waxwings had nothing at all in their tummies but nandina berries, while millions of birds have enjoyed a mixed diet including some nandina berries over the past two centuries. Too much of a good thing can be fatal. While just swallowing a few whole won’t harm you, actually chewing and eating quantities of seeds or pits from apples, cherries, apricots, pears, peaches or plums can make you sick or even kill you.
Even more to the point, few nurseries bother with the straight species these days. Floppy and leggy, it has long been superceded by compact, non-fruiting forms. Of these, ‘Gulf Stream’ and ‘Moon Bay’ are particularly reliable, long-lived and handsome year-round. Both mature to 4-5 feet high and wide, with colorful new growth as well as good fall and winter color.
So, should you rip out all your nandina? Not at all. Even if you happen to have the plain Jane species in your yard, you can make sure that it won’t wander or kill off any critters by simply cutting off the spent flowers before they set seed.
Ann wrote the best pruning advice I’ve ever seen for Nandinas (last paragraph here), and recommended them for spots close to doorways.

“Gulf Stream” Nandina variety, showing its excellent winter color (and no berries).
Why Nandinas are So Popular

In my back garden, Nandinas provide a narrow band of evergreen screening below the Crossvine, which won’t grow low to the ground.
- They’re evergreen.
- Sun or shade – no problem.
- They come in a variety of eventual heights from 2 to 6 feet and 3-4 feet wide, without sheering. Great for tight spots.
- Within a year or so of planting, they’re so drought-tolerant you can generally forget about them.
So the next time I open my garden to visitors, I’ll have a link – to this very blog post – to send to accusatory visitors, of which I’m sure there will be more. These are the times we’re gardening in.
How dare you have non-native invasive bird-killing shrubs in your yard! (sarcasm) I have a good number of the Gulf Stream ones in my yard for all the reasons you mentioned, and one more. They grow just fine under a maple tree.
Now here is some irony. I have been a nursery retailer and landscaper almost my entire life from California to the Pacific Northwest. We used Nandina everywhere in California and when I moved to the northwest I was glad not to see it in every landscape. But over the last 30 years here it has crept into many landscapes, even considering that it can occasionally be killed to the ground in a hard winter (yes, hard winter is a term for us so stop laughing). As all of the newer fabulous cultivars of Nandina have come onto the market we have promoted them as being compact, mildew resistant, incredible colorful foliage that remains all the way to the ground, but never, I repeat, never to my knowledge, have they been promoted as non-blooming. How did I miss this? Of course, now that I am aware of this I have to say that of all the many Gulf Stream plants we have sold and planted in landscapes I have never noticed any berries, I always thought of it as a shortcoming. Well, I guess the times have changed. I am now driven to reach out to our many suppliers and see how they are marketing these new compact, non-blooming varieties. Of course in my defense, nandinas are not considered invasive in our area so blooms or no blooms would be a non issue. As for cedar waxwings, as a child I do remember growing up in the San Diego area and having flocks of these dumbass birds descend into our garden and strip the pyracantha naked and then fly off into the neighbor’s plate glass windows drunk as a skunk. I suspect Darwin might have something to say about that behavior. Thanks for sharing.
Replying to my own reply, there is nothing in the literature that indicates that either Moon Bay or Gulf Stream are fruitless. To the contrary they tout the bright flowers and colorful fruit. That being said, in my experience these two cultivars fruit very sparingly if at all. Just wanted to clear that up.
Oh my god. I live in the epicenter of the nandina wars and have been ranting about this false story for several years to the point of almost receiving death threats. Someone from our local chapter of the Audubon society – which keeps posting this same fake story on social media regularly – told me that they didn’t care if it isn’t true… they just don’t like nandina because it’s non-native! (And *poof!* I lost all respect for the Audubon society.)
That report about lethal nandina came from the University of Georgia – which also stated that the bird’s behavior was ultimately the cause of their mortality – and was jazzed up and printed as a call to arms by a “garden writer” in a Portland newspaper and it has been published almost verbatim since then all over the country.
Even though it’s been discredited, the story persists because of native nazi hysteria and lazy journalism and wives tales that permeate our art form.
Nandinas were introduced to the south in the 1850’s and is a very common garden plant here. Cedar waxwings populations are healthy and climbing despite 175 years of eating nandina berries. The Japanese waxwing is almost identical to our own and guess what? It eats nandina in its native habitat.
I don’t care a thing about nandina – but I really hate the sloppy and misguided advice that comes from horticultural media.
Excellent rant, David!
We can learn to use the phrase, “you are misinformed!”
Another Good thing about nandinas: They are easy to root/ transplant. I just put generous cuttings in the ground and water … they survive and thrive!! There are lots of poisonous plants; just make sure you have bird feeders in the fall and winter for them to choose instead of your nandinas.
❤️
Thanks Susan. Speaking as someone who has spoken out against this ridiculously hyped “study” for years – I’m glad to see the real story get a bit more press. Last year saw nandinas touted as “destroying the planet” by a horticulture professional. Kept a screenshot of that one just to remind me. – MW
The latest posted MD invasive plants list (February 27, 2023) showed that Nandina domestica ‘Firepower’ has been approved for deregulation to be taken off the Tier 2 list.
considering that it does not flower that makes perfect sense
Thanks, I’ve been concerned about Nandina. Always love your essays, Susan!
Is the Nandina pruning link correct? It takes me to the same place as the doorway link. No mention of how to prune
I’ll work on correcting the link
I’ll fix it. It’s actually the “Don’t be afraid…” link above. Pruning advice in the final paragraph.
Thank you! I learned a lot!
My berberis Orange Rocket hasn’t killed any birds or butterflies yet, to my knowledge (but I’m sure some “study” will soon “prove” the opposite). It’s sterile and thus non-invasive, but I have to defend that poor, little, colorful shrub so often that I consider putting up a permanent poster: “This plant is harmless and not invasive. Please consider facts over assumptions!”
Yep, these are the times we garden in… Thanks, Susan, for being a voice of reason again and again!
When the native plant movement became a public policy issue about 30 years ago, there was some push back from those who like our diverse landscape of native and non-native plants. Native plant advocates found they could recruit more support for their efforts if they claimed that non-native plants were harmful. The accusations were more influential with nature lovers when they claimed that wildlife was harmed by the non-native plants, or were more flammable, or used more water, etc., etc..
The claim that eucalyptus trees kill birds was an early examples of that strategy in the San Francisco Bay Area. A serious birder wrote an article in a publication for local birders claiming he saw 2 dead birds in 2 different eucalyptus forests. Based on his sample of 2, he speculated that eucalyptus nectar gums the beaks of birds and suffocates them. Then Audubon Magazine exploded the 2 dead birds into 300 “moribund” birds without citing any evidence and claimed that bird nests were blowing out of the trees because the trees are unstable…also providing no evidence, despite the fact that there were 2 empirical studies proving otherwise.
It took many years to silence that fabricated story. Evidence was provided that disproved the accusation and repeated for years, but the desire to believe the story was strong enough for many to resist the facts.
Gluttony is considered to be a sin…so a sinful death?
Thanks, Susan. Even fighting this plant nazi madness for years.When Nandinas are outlawed, only outlaws will grow Nandinas.”
Thanks so much, Susan. I’d been skeptical about the whole issue, but not knowledgeable on the subject. This article is a keeper!
I’m so happy to read this! They were a foundation planting where I grew up and I carry a fondness for their beauty