Did you hear about the GREAT news from California? The legislature passed and the governor signed a law banning gas-powered leaf-blowers and lawn-mowers! (Also chain saws, weed-trimmers and golf carts.) The ban takes effect as early as 2024, when all newly sold small-motor equipment primarily used for landscaping have to be zero-emission – either battery-operated or plugged-in. The law applies only to any engines of less than 25 gross horsepower, so it doesn’t apply to on-road motor vehicles, off-road motorcycles, all-terrain vehicles, boats, snowmobiles or model airplanes, cars or boats.
Yes, it’s a burden for the landscape-care industry, so the state set aside $30 million to help professional landscapers make the transition. Industry representatives say that’s not adequate for the estimated 50,000 small businesses that will be affected by the law.
Margaret Renkl’s Rant in the NY Times
Nashville-based Margaret Renkl included the California news in her column “First Thing We Do, Let’s Kill All the Leaf Blowers,” describing the noise in fall as a “deafening, surging swarm, blasting from lawn to lawn and filling the air with the stench of gasoline and death. I would call them mechanical locusts…”
She quotes Audobon Magazine:
Some produce more than 100 decibels of low-frequency, wall-penetrating sound — or as much noise as a plane taking off — at levels that can cause tinnitus and hearing loss with long exposure.”
And the DC-based writer James Fallows:
James Fallows summarized the emissions problem this way: “Using a two-stroke engine is like heating your house with an open pit fire in the living room — and chopping down your trees to keep it going, and trying to whoosh away the fetid black smoke before your children are poisoned by it.”
I’m SO on board with these sentiments! I too hate the noise but also the crap they blow into my eyes whenever one is operating nearby.
A National Trend?
Quoting Renkl,
Only the Environmental Protection Agency can set emission standards. But California, owing to its unique climate and geography, which allow airborne pollutants to coalesce and linger, is the exception to this federal limitation. Other states can opt to follow California’s more stringent tailpipe emissions standards, as 12 states and the District of Columbia do.
More than 100 cities across the country have already passed regulations to ban or restrict gas-powered leaf blowers. For people committed to their manicured lawns, the good news is that powerful electric and battery-operated leaf blowers now exist, and they are quieter and greener and healthier than gasoline-powered blowers. Their market share is also growing rapidly; electric equipment now represents roughly 44 percent of lawn-care machinery sales.
Kill your Lawn, Too!
But then Renkl goes after lawns – all of them:
Nearly everything about how Americans “care” for their lawns is deadly. Pesticides prevent wildflower seeds from germinating and poison the insects that feed songbirds and other wildlife. Lawn mower blades, set too low, chop into bits the snakes and turtles and baby rabbits that can’t get away in time. Mulch, piled too deep, smothers ground-nesting bees, and often the very plants that mulch is supposed to protect, as well.
Then, while endorsing another popular meme – Leave the Leaves! – she slings this zinger at turfgrass:
[Leave the leaves] if your lawn consists of entirely of unvariegated turf grass (which it should not, given that turf grass requires immense amounts of water and poison to maintain).
Like SO many Americans with lawns, when I had one I dumped neither poison NOR water on it. Eco-gardeners these days promote “good-enough lawns” that are care-free and require NO inputs, much less poisons and scarce water resources. (Okay, maybe some overseeding, watering in the new seeds, and aerating every few years if the soil is compacted.)
And from my observation, most regular homeowners take the lowest-maintenance approach possible, especially when it comes to buying the “poisons” and having to apply them. That’s no fun. I imagine. Never done it!
Oh, and Renkl’s term “unvariegated turf grass” is something she must have invented. At least hers is the only use of the term to be found online. If she meant perfect, uniform lawns, we’d know that’s what that means – not the typical good-enough one.
But speaking of attack high-maintenance, golf-course-quality lawn care that’s done by the wealthiest minority of homeowners, let’s keep on ranting about it, maybe changing more laws.
But lumping all lawn-owners in one batch of poisoners can turn off some who might just improve their lawn-care practices with good information – and no shaming.
Back to Renkl’s column. When I see sweeping generalizations I naturally click on the author’s source (if there IS one), and in this case I assumed that Renkl was misinterpreting or exaggerating some study or other. The article she linked to is “Electric or Gas Leaf Blowers…Neither?” from Washington University in St. Louis. Call me a stickler but that article says NOTHING about water and poisons being required to maintain turfgass.
I guess the NYT doesn’t have factcheckers. In this case I’m not surprised – I’ve seen other exaggerations in Renkl’s columns.
That’s so unlike the Times’s actual garden writer, the reliably trustworthy Margaret Roach. She does the research, and keeps doing it.
Washington University and “Leave the Leaves”
But I was sorry to see that the Wash. U. article go farther, using the Xerces Society as a source:
Leaves are free mulch, protecting perennial plants, especially those that sprout early. Consider piling leaves on empty vegetable beds or perennial beds, or around the bases of trees to protect from cold and keep in moisture
Oh, dear! I complained about statements like that in my 2015 post “The NWF’s Terrible, No-Good Gardening Advice Goes Viral.” In it, I challenged the idea that turfgrass and ALL perennials are just fine under a bed of leaves all winter. Not all plants are the same!
Interestingly (or sadly), the National Wildlife Federation’s original article (just ignore the title) actually advises leaf-leaving IN WOODLANDS, not gardens! But others have taken up the meme and run with it for gardens, period.
Is it possible to say “Most plants are fine under a bed of leaves all winter – but check!” For checking I’d suggest reading about them – do they like to dry out between rains? Or uncovering some of your sun-loving plants from places where leaves don’t fall (Mediterranean climates with few deciduous trees), like lamb’s ears or groundcover Sedums, to see if they’re doing okay.
But I know that’s way too complicated for memes. And meme’s gotta meme!
I’m on board with this about the leaf blowers, but chain saws? It’s hard to believe they would ban gas powered chain saws everywhere in CA, particularly in rural areas, where access to recharging or an electrical outlet might be impossible.
I agree. Maybe there should be different standards applied in rural areas. Electric or battery operated chainsaws are not very efficient for cutting large trees and working away from power sources. I can see the reasoning for eliminating small gas engine use in urban and suburban areas but not in rural or forested areas. Does this also apply to logging operations? Can’t imagine wood processors operating without gasoline powered chainsaws.
People in rural areas don’t want to hear mega-decibel motors every weekend, either. It’s kind of why they moved to or stayed in a rural area, “peace and quiet”.
But the other people who might have been there much longer than the new people MIGHT have to make a living by logging, cutting firewood (for all those trendy fireplaces and outdoor firepits),or are simply cutting brush to clear out a field. I live in a rural area, I don’t like to hear chainsaws but I live with it. My husband uses one occaisionally, my neighbors run tractors, others target practice…this is what happens in some rural areas. People shouldn’t move to someplace and then try to change it into their idea of “utopia”. I’d much rather hear a chainsaw on weekends than traffice noises every single minute of the day.
Have a friend that owns a lawn and garden equipment shop. Buy and repair. He carries Stihl who has a pretty good battery powered line up. I said I was interested in a battery powered blower and He sniffed and said well for you ok, but real men use gas powered ones. The only way I get my spouse to do anything in the yard is to let him use his big boy toys.
No one has addressed the no gas powered golf carts. These are used all the time by retirees. Not sure if the battery powered ones have enough oomph?
Susan, serious hot-button topic for me – and a little hurt you do not quote me 🙂
My column for the September/October issue The American Gardener (American Horticultural Society) was in defense of Quieter, Healthier Neighborhoods. I went into great detail about this same issue. The timing was so eerie in fact, I even flattered (and berated) myself that Newsom read it and then brandished his magic pen to slay the perceived dragon.
EXCEPT.
I did NOT promote the use of mandates or bans to punish industries and homeowners. Which I guess is why I’m not writing opinion columns for the NYT. Though I love my battery operated series of blower/trimmer/strimmer/chain saw. I find outright bans to be over-generalized and over-reaching, and rife with unintended consequences. They also disproportionately favor large businesses over smaller ones which cannot absorb those kind of costs and disappear without a whimper. It is not just about equipment, but time lost – as the best of battery equipment is still ½ to two-thirds as powerful as gas-powered, and the amount of batteries needed to supply a crew for a full workday (often running off a gas-powered generator) is huge.
The manufacture and (more importantly) disposal of these batteries is still a very problematic issue. Doesn’t matter how great it sounds, it is still in its infancy. Sweeping mandates right now remind me of how my county forced children to access their textbooks and all assignments online, without a care for rural parents like myself with pathetic internet service. Oh sure there was money available to strengthen available broadband to cities and towns, but a huge amount of us fall through those cracks. Too bad.
Mandates polarize people – they do not seek to understand and compromise, but to create “good” and “bad” players, and pull people’s backs against the wall. If you are for the moderate use of gas mowers/blowers you are evil, if you are for banning them, you are virtuous. My used, gas-powered golf cart is the single most valuable tool I own – it is like having a paid employee to cart and haul in a fraction of the time it would take me with a wheelbarrow. Except I can’t afford a paid employee. So I use my golf cart as a valuable tool, with moderation, and respect. Gavin Newsom can afford many employees. He will not be hurt by his own mandates. The landscapes that he is privileged to enjoy will not suffer, and he sure as hell won’t be carting his own compost anywhere.
Instead we should be shifting our perspective as a culture as to how neat is neat enough, and to re-examine the maintenance load our particular landscapes require of us. As the technology shifts, and it is, more people are recognizing the ease of these tools, their environmental benefits and their suitability to smaller yards in particular. We should also examine where using any type of equipment is completely unnecessary. I watched a man blowing grass clippings in a huge multi-lane intersection this weekend. Laughable.
This is where we should start. Should our streets resemble newly vacuumed floors, or – horror upon horror – outdoor streets? Robust discussion on a local level is critical. HOAs are also complicit in this narrative, forcing residents to pay for services that could be cut considerably, and still remain attractive. With over a quarter of our population currently residing in HOAs this could have a SIGNIFICANT effect on emissions. But I’ll leave the HOA matter for my column about them in the Nov/Dec issue….. In Defense of The Freedom to Garden – MW
Here, Here, Marianne! I agree. Make electric options cheaper, make them more convenient on the right size properties, but blanket bans based on someone’s opinions or own politics….well, they should be banned. Ban the bans!
This from the guy that wants to stop the semi-annual time change…..
P.S. I find it breathtakingly ironic that the title of Margaret Renkl’s opinion piece invokes the conversation between a populist and his followers rising against King Henry in Henry VI. “First thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.” says Dick the Butcher. Who can argue with such an obviously virtuous and popular statement? Everyone hates lawyers, right? But Shakespeare was illustrating the ultimate malevolency of such a technique, not the virtue. I think a new headline is in order, lest she undermine her generalizations. – MW
Thank you Marianne! As a Californian who lives in the suburbs but owns rural property, I sweep my yard because I don’t like the dust and noise of a leaf blower but use gas powered equipment on the property because there’s nowhere to plug in battery chargers or cords. Besides, with the power companies going bankrupt and scheduling “rolling blackouts,” what good is battery or electric equipment if you have limited access to electricity?
Cindy — that is another excellent point, one which I completely understand (having had to help my elderly mother navigate several of them). ….And a point that harkens back to the negative unintended consequences of other virtuous policies. Personal responsibility and stewardship is worth teaching and communicating, not mandating. -MW
Oh I’m hurt. Hahaha. Keep California all for folks like you. I’ll stay with normal society. Whine with ya later.
23 will be a blow out year for gas powered mowers, leafblower, chainsaws etc. I’m on 5 acres and no battery powered equipment can get the job done. All this will do is force people to burn gas over to Nevada to buy their new gas powered equipment in 24.
This is so racist.
It’s elitist, but I fail to see racism referred to in any of the above comments or in the article itself.
Same thing really.
Like saying the British royals aren’t racist just elitist.
Well God still put them above the rest.
So what’s the diff?
Mexicans still are the ones whose livelihood are affected.