Unusually Clever People

Presidentially appointed but unpaid landscape architects making our spaces better

commission70nopicweb

Here in DC, big projects that affect the look of Washington and our enjoyment thereof must be approved by all sorts of agencies, but my favorite and the one I’ve seen make the most improvements through their review is the oddly named U.S. Commission of Fine Arts.  Its website explains that they review important projects like memorials, public spaces, public art, big urban design changes, military cemeteries around the world, but also coins and medals, and even private homes if they can be seen from a national park.

Since the Commission’s beginning in 1910, when Frederick Law Olmsted, Jr. was an original appointee, it’s never had more than one landscape architect serving at a time.  So it’s a really big deal that suddenly, three of the seven commissioners are landscape architects. They are Dean Beth Meyer at U.VA, Mia Lehrer  from Los Angeles, and DC’s own Liza Gilbert.

So why the change from architects to landscape architects?  Maybe it’s because of the 2009 sustainability goals for federal properties, which requires lots of landscape expertise on the CFA.  Landscape Architecture Magazine boasts that “The appointment of three landscape professionals confirms that landscape architecture’s contributions are fully recognized at the highest levels of government,” and that’s no doubt true.

But wait; two of the architect members are really urban designers and planners, so their expertise overlaps with that of landscape architecture, and they pay plenty of attention to outdoor spaces.  One is Miami architect/city planner Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk, a leader in the New Urbanism movement and a designer of Seaside, Florida. The other is architect/urban designer Alex Krieger, who teaches at Harvard and consults for cities all over the world.  Filling out the current board are architect Phil Freelon and Chairman Rusty Powell, who happens to also direct the National Gallery of Art.  On the far right in the photo is top staffer Tom Luebke, also an architect.

Two others with landscape expertise have served on recent Commission panels – Witold Rybczynski, a big writer and thinker about cities, and landscape architect Diana Balmori, an early advocate for less lawn. 

All over town, the memorials and big projects that visitors and locals see and love have been made better by these folks, who serve without pay.  Expenses only. And as a long-time resident and lover of this city, I thank them for their service.

Farewell!

I’m writing about this little-known agency now because I recently retired as its provider of transcripts for 18 years, during which time I sat at their table while the world’s best (and occasionally worst) architects, landscape architects and artists presented projects, which the Commission members then discussed openly and with surprising frankness when it was needed, which was often.  And unlike virtually all the other clients I ever worked for in that capacity (especially Congressional committees!), I’ll actually miss the Commission of Fine Arts, in no small part because of its cumulative smarts about landscapes and urban spaces, now more than ever.

I’m sure I’ve learned a thing or two about design from attending so many design review meetings over the years (and previously, the city’s urban planning board).  One that comes to mind is something I heard former Chairman J. Carter Brown say dozens of times to applicants – “Have the courage of your convictions!” – which has occasionally emboldened me to be less timid in my garden-making, and occasionally in life.

Plus, the landscape architects who’ve appeared before the CFA over the 18 years have left their mark on me, turning me into a cheerleader for the profession.  That’s what happens when you hear geniuses like Lawrence Halprin, Laurie Olin, Peter Walker, Michael Van Valkenburgh, and Kathryn Gustafson passionately present their visions for great outdoor spaces.  At least that’s been the effect on this gardener.

Finally, I’ll miss the terrific staff and have threatened to stop by sometime when I’m near their offices in the fabulous National Building Museum.

Posted by on December 12, 2014 at 8:00 am, in the category Unusually Clever People.
Comments are off for this post

4 responses to “Presidentially appointed but unpaid landscape architects making our spaces better”

  1. What a great long-term gig you had! Congratulations and thanks for your own service. Many Harvard names here. Beth Meyer was my first year studio professor at the GSD, shortly before she headed south to UVA. Alex Kreiger, and many others you named, all GSD related. Glad the group is as landscape friendly as it appears these days.

  2. Thank you for this. True insight and a positive message. So often I watch and read and listen to barbs and jabs exchanged between designers, landscape architects, and related fields and it makes me sad.

    There are so many fine, caring people across the disciplines that are concerned with gardening, the landscape, and the environment.

    Finally, congratulations and thanks for your service with the Commission.

  3. Sheila says:

    I had no idea such a group existed. Thanks, Susan, for calling them to our attention, and thanks to them (and you!) for making DC a better and more beautiful place. Also, I just have to second your thoughts about the National Building Museum. It is indeed fabulous—and one of my very favorite places in DC!

  4. Thank you so much for this article. I had no idea this group exists until I read about it in Landscape Architecture. All the names you mentioned, present and past, have contributed so much to landscape design. How very fortunate, indeed, that you had an opportunity to be a part of this and thank you for your service. No doubt you will miss it.

  • Follow Garden Rant

    Follow Me on Pinterest RSS