What's Happening

Protecting Turfgrass from Springsteen Fans is One Huge Job

valor

Tonight, in celebration of Veterans Day, one huge concert will take place on the National Mall, with headliners like Bruce Springsteen, Rihanna and Eminem. You can watch live it on HBO if you’re a cable subscriber, whether or not you pay extra for HBO. Or if you live nearby you can be one of the 800,000 expected to attend, thanks to heavy promotion and great weather.  (Though it sure won’t be easy attending, and warnings and instructions abound in local media.)

IMG_4203

But enough about the show; what about the damage those 800,000 people might do to the  Mall’s newly restored and super-expensive lawn?  Well, Rant readers, rest assured that your local correspondent investigated the preparations for the concert and has concluded that the turf will probably survive. Or so I’m assuming, because the extent of the turf protection is massive, as you’ll see.

Above is the stage, some color-adjusting TV device I don’t understand, and what looks almost like an ice rink.

IMG_4208

But in this closer shot you see it’s some kind of green and white panels being installed.  The Washington Post explains:

The flooring that will be installed is called Terraplas, according to the Trust for the National Mall. It lets in light and water and won’t harm the turf. It can be removed afterward. And all will be well as long as it’s not down for too long.

According to new Park Service rules, event organizers have to pay to protect the grass, and I’m sure that acres of Terraplas aren’t cheap to rent, install and remove.  But hey, neither is the turf, with its $40 million price tag.

IMG_4391

Still, I can’t help but wonder about the cost of this whole turf-protecting operation and how many events have room for it in their budget. Very few, I imagine, which is how many events we’ll be seeing on the Mall in the future under the new turf-protection regime. Unpopular as these new rules are (they supposedly limit our right to assemble, among other complaints), if we want turf here instead of bare soil and mud, something had to change.

IMG_4393

Photos taken on Saturday, November 8.

Posted by on November 11, 2014 at 8:42 am, in the category What's Happening.
Comments are off for this post

6 responses to “Protecting Turfgrass from Springsteen Fans is One Huge Job”

  1. Kimberly Thomas says:

    Ridiculous waste of money in tight times. The previous grass wasn’t mud although it wasn’t golf course quality by any means. And we should be able to assemble without a fee. That said I would love to check out this fancy new technology :)

  2. Lindy says:

    This was very interesting. Thank you for sharing all this. Pretty fascinating.

  3. Pam J. says:

    Way, way off topic again, but I watched maybe 1/3 of the performances last night (I wanted to catch Metallica and Springsteen and succeeded) and I was surprised, but happy with, the song choices. Washington Post writer Chris Richards says Springsteen proved again “that being anti-war and pro-veteran aren’t mutually exclusive.” And the title of the column refers to a “rough-edged reverence.” It’s always good to see Bruce attempt, once again, to take back his song “Born in the USA,” which still continues to be misunderstood by a lot of politicians who don’t do their homework. Seeing Bruce, Dave Grohl, and Zac Brown singing “I ain’t no Senator’s son” in front of the Capitol was fun.

  4. Joe Schmitt says:

    Pricing the people off of the grass will send them onto the streets.

  5. Jennifer says:

    It’s expensive to maintain an illusion. If it’s to be a place for gathering, why not put a surface suitable for gathering?

  • Follow Garden Rant

    Follow Me on Pinterest RSS