In response to questions raised by John Peter’s reply, here’s a
tidbit about the Invasive Species Advisory Committee (ISAC) on which
Monsanto sits, from the website of the National Invasive Species
The ISAC has been instrumental in writing the National Invasive Species Council Management Plan. Several working groups were convened under the auspices of ISAC to help write the eight sections of the Plan.
Peter points me to a correction I’m happy to make – that the longer
list of comporations belongs to the California’s invasive species group,
rather than the federal one.
And Googling "Monsanto invasive species" yields info about another
connection the company has to the whole issue – its involvement with
genetically engineered soybeans which are now being accused of
invasiveness. Boy, talk about your tangled web! Not that they’re
guilty of anything, of course (hey, I took the law boards, ya
know) but I’m all about asking questions. Here’s a quote and link if
you’re so inclined:
Proponents of the seed pre-emption bills, including the
Agriculture Department, are championing the interests of corporate
"gene giants" such as Monsanto and Syngenta — not citizens. Whether
you’re for or against genetically modified seeds, the pre-emption bills
represent an anti-democratic measure to take control away from
On a more personal note, "Invasive Notes" goes on to say:
tend to get excited at the thought that someone is thinking about
keeping them from being the first person in the area to have the newest
North Korean vine, but I do not hear much controversy over the federal
government’s attempt to control the spread of the emerald ash borer or "sudden oak" death. We want our government to protect us except when individual greed overwhelms us.
I don’t care about being the first person in my area to have the newest
North Korean vine, though I understand that collectors may. And I know
that researchers in a variety of fields are interested in importing
plant species, and there must be others with a dog in this fight that
I’m unaware of. Here in my own garden most of my plants have a function they need to perform, so I’m anxious to keep the best
performers available. For example, I might "get excited" if I
had to give up, say, plain old creeping liriope, which I’ve found to be
the best plant for preventing erosion on my steep, shaded banks.
Now because bloggers love to opine about blogging – admit it! – I’m
going to go out on a limb here and offer John Peter some suggestions
about his, which just went on line October 1. Yes, a newborn is among
- The entries are "posted by Ioannis Petrus" and the URL includes
that person’s name, so who is he or she and what’s the connection with
- I may be too long out of college but I totally don’t understand your tag line. Sorry.
- Referring to GardenRant as simply "a gardening blog site"? Ooh,
that’s low. Bloggers have egos, ya know. Oh, yeah – everybody knows
Thanks again, John Peter, for being part of our discussion. And keep on blogging!Posted by Susan Harris on October 7, 2006 at 8:54 am, in the category Ministry of Controversy.